Another advantageous feature of strict majority rules is that they promote better decision-making. If a constitution can only be changed by a strict super-majority rule, as with the U.S. Constitution, then the constitutional provisions should last a long time. Therefore, it will often be difficult to predict how they will affect people in the future. This means that regulations will be passed behind a limited veil of ignorance, causing people to focus on the public interest rather than their narrow advantage. For example, if it`s not clear which party will control the presidency in the future, it makes sense to decide what powers the president should have, not based on the prediction that his party will control the office, but based on the presidential powers that will further the public interest. Given that often (but not always, as in the case of race) it will not be clear which party or group will be in the majority, there will be a strong incentive to include the protection of minorities and individual rights. The Constitution of the United States of America, S.PUB.103-21 (1994) (pdf), prepared in 1994 by the Office of the Secretary of the Senate with the assistance of Johnny H. Killian of the Library of Congress, provided the original text of each clause of the Constitution with an explanation of its meaning and how that meaning has changed over time. The President, Vice President, and all U.S. officials are removed from office for impeachment and conviction for treason, corruption, or other serious crimes and misdemeanors.
Section 5. Sections 1 and 2 shall enter into force on 15 October following the ratification of this Article. The controversies over Article VII that arose during the ratification process concerned the content of the prescribed ratification process, not what the text actually prescribed. Antifederalists and federalists agreed on the meaning of “ratification”, “new” and “states”. Vermont did not count much as a state of the vermonters` lot, who declared independence in 1777 but were not represented in the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation. In the event of the removal of the President or the death, resignation or inability to exercise the powers and functions of such office, it shall be transmitted to the Vice-President, and Congress may, by law, provide for the dismissal, death, resignation or incapacity of the President and the Vice-President. explain which officer then acts as chair, and that officer acts accordingly until the disability is revoked or a chair is elected. The goal of nine was to get thirteen. Article VII may explain that the U.S. Constitution was the law of the land when it was ratified by nine states, but the drafters and the text clearly anticipated a unification of the thirteen states. Nine encouraged early ratification while preventing recalcitrant States from making favourable concessions. The policy behind Article VII emphasizes the importance of thinking about how constitutions should work, rather than focusing solely on what words mean at any given time.
No State may impose levies or duties on imports or exports without the consent of Congress, unless this is absolutely necessary for the enforcement of its inspection laws: and the net production of all duties and charges levied by a State on imports or exports shall be for the use of the United States Treasury; and all such laws are subject to scrutiny and scrutiny by Congress. Section 1. One year after the ratification of this Article, the manufacture, sale or transportation of intoxicating spirits domestically, their importation into the United States and all territories under its jurisdiction for beverage purposes, or their export from the United States and all territories under its jurisdiction for beverage purposes shall be prohibited. Section 5. Congress shall have the power to apply the provisions of this Article by appropriate legislation. To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases, over a district (not more than ten square miles) which, by the cession of certain states and the adoption of Congress, may become the seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise the same authority in all places, which is determined by the consent of the legislature of the State in which it is to be, were acquired for the construction of fortresses, stores, arsenals, port courtyards and other necessary buildings; And Congress will have the power to levy and collect income taxes from any source, without division between states, and regardless of any census or enumeration. Article VII literally promises a constitutional regime that the drafters agreed to be “harmful” and “destructive.” Federalist No. 6 states: “If these states were to be.. United only in partial confederations, the subdivisions into which they could be thrown would have frequent and violent clashes with each other. Nevertheless, Article VII provides for a constitutional regime that does not include Virginia, New York, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, a political regime divided into two parts, with the southern states and New England, but Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, or two separate nations, with either a separate confederacy consisting of Virginia, of North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, or one, which consists of Massachusetts.
Connecticut, Rhode Island and New Hampshire. Consider the paradoxes that result if some states had not been ratified. Under Article I of Confederation, unratified states were still part of a confederation called “The United States.” According to Article VII of the Constitution, only the states that ratify the states form the United States. Will the real United States rise up please? Article VII states that the Constitution becomes the official law of the country when it is ratified by nine states. How did this affect Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, and Rhode Island when New Hampshire ratified on June 21, 1788? Were they unrelated States which did not require congressional authorization to join the Union and which could not be discriminated against under Article 1, Section 9? Were these nations that needed congressional authorization to join the Union and could be discriminated against under Article 1, Section 9? When did unrelated states become one or more distinct nations? The Constitution does not say so, and the point has not been discussed at length. .